Archive for the ‘math’ Category

On Finishing Books

March 16th, 2010

reading-graph

I just finished W.G. Sebald’s Austerlitz, which all things considered is a pretty good book, despite my occasional furious claims to the contrary.1 I started it sometime around October, read most of it, and then put it aside. I just finished the last hundred-odd pages a few minutes ago. This seems to be a pattern — I start a book really enthusiastically, then get a little bored or distracted and put it down for awhile. Eventually I get so tired of seeing it sitting in my queue, shamefully reminding me of my miniscule attention span, that I just plant myself down on the couch and force myself to finish it. The satisfaction of finishing the book outweighs the grueling completion process.

This isn’t usually the case, of course. Only for certain books. I’m pretty sure I’d hate reading if this was the normal situation.

Note that the concept of book-graphing has been explored before, which reminds me: I want the book equivalent of a pedometer, so I can settle this graph thing once and for all. Then I want to correlate information about the structure, genre and subject matter of the book with the pace at which I read it.

If I worked at Amazon, I would be spying on customers’ Kindle usage and mining that data so hard.

1 No chapters? Really? Why would you do that, Sebald? I demand discrete chunks.

books, computer science, infographic, math | 2 Comments »

Logicomix

March 14th, 2010

logicomix

I’m pretty sure that if you like this blog you’d like a graphic novel biography of Bertrand Russell, which is exactly what Logicomix is.

art+design, books, history, math, old dead white guys | 2 Comments »

Math Ruins Everything

March 12th, 2010

Julia just sent me one of Paul Krugman’s analyses of the causes of the financial meltdown: How Did Economists Get It So Wrong?

The whole article’s good, but I especially love this point:

… economists, as a group, mistook beauty, clad in impressive-looking mathematics, for truth… the central cause of the profession’s failure was the desire for an all-encompassing, intellectually elegant approach that also gave economists a chance to show off their mathematical prowess.

Pointedly ignoring the differences between a beautifully abstract model and the messy underlying reality that it (supposedly) represents? Well I’ve certainly never been guilty of that particular intellectual sin.

economics, math | No Comments »

Budget Proposal 2011

February 2nd, 2010

2011 Budget

The New York Times has a lovely interactive infographic detailing the proposed 2011 budget.

art+design, infographic, laws, math | No Comments »

Nomograms

January 10th, 2010

bmi-nomogram

Nomograms (or sometimes nomographs) are graphical single-purpose analog computing devices. They range from the very simple – like the above BMI calculator – to the (often beautifully) complex. Once upon a time they were commonly used for navigation, astronomy, surveying, and countless other things. Now, what with cheap omnipresent digital computers, they’ve fallen into disuse.

Like beautiful math? Need a calendar for 2010? Download a copy of Ron Doerfler’s Graphical Computing Calendar.

art+design, infographic, math | No Comments »

Undirected Deliciousness

January 9th, 2010

Flavor Graph

Connected flavors taste good together. Any additions?

actual food, math | 2 Comments »

We Know You’re Out There, Spiderman

November 22nd, 2009

Abstract

Using absolutely bulletproof science, we demonstrate that 35.3 spidermen are created annually and that hundreds live secretly among us.

Introduction

Prompted by arguments about the possibility of radioactive spidermen living among us, Mr. Harman and I decided to use science to determine how many spidermen (if any) exist on Earth. It’s difficult to extrapolate from the single known instance of a spiderman (hereafter the SKI), but following the example of the Drake equation we’ve developed a predictive formula. Behold the incontrovertible majesty of the Harman-Schwartz equation:

Our equation states that:

N = Pe × fs × fr × fl × fp × fg

where:

N
is the number of radioactive spidermen created each year.
Pe
is the population of the Earth.
fs
is the fraction of people who are bitten by a spider each year.
fr
is the fraction of spider-bites perpetrated by irradiated spiders.
fl
is the fraction of bitten people who survive.
fp
is the fraction of bitten people who develop superpowers.
fg
is the fraction of spidermen who choose to use their powers for good.

Total Population

Note that by using the above formula we’ve only calculated the number of spidermen being generated each year and not the total number of spiderman living on earth at any given time. This can be calculated by the following equation:

Ntot = N(<Ad> – <Ac>)

where:

Ntot
is the total number of spidermen living on earth at any given time.
<Ad>
is the expected age at which a spiderman dies.
<Ac>
is the expected age at which a spiderman is created.

Plugging in the Numbers

Pe
The population of the Earth is around 6.67 billion.
fs
We estimate that about 1.66 × 10-3% of people are bitten by a spider each year.
fr
Between Chernobyl, Hiroshima/Nagasaki, and assorted other tests and accidents, about 2.55% of the land area of the Earth has been irradiated to some degree. We can use this as fr if we assume an evenly distributed spider distribution.
fl
The vast majority (about 99.9%) of people survive spider bites, but obviously irradiated spiders are more deadly. Let’s set fl to 50%.
fp
Working off the SKI, we’d have to assume that this is 100%. Let’s be conservative, though, and say only a tenth of people bitten by radioactive spiders develop superpowers.
fg
We’re totally guessing here and saying that 25% of superpowered radioactive spidermen will dedicate their lives to doing good.

Plugging those figures into the equation, we estimate that on average, 35.3 spidermen are created annually.

<Ac>
The median age in the world’s population is 27.5 years, which is what we’re using.
<Ad>
This is a controversial term. For the purposes of our study, we’ve made the simplifying assumption that spidermen have an average lifespan equal to the human average (73.1 years). It could be argued for the that spidermen are especially prone to an early violent death, but following the example of the SKI we argue that the rates of violent death and cloning are approximately equal, thereby sidestepping the whole issue.

By plugging these numbers into our final equation, we find that at any given time on Earth, on average there are 1,609 radioactive spidermen living secretly among us.

animals, cranks, math, science | No Comments »

Quines

July 21st, 2009

Named after the American philosopher and logician W.V.O. Quine, a quine is a program whose only output is its own code. Here’s a neat example in Lisp/Scheme, taken from the wikipedia article:

((lambda (x) (list x (list 'quote x)))
'(lambda (x) (list x (list 'quote x))))

computer science, language, math, old dead white guys | No Comments »

MIT GEB Lectures

June 4th, 2009

For the last few years, MIT has been putting the course materials for many (about 1,900) of its classes online for free as part of its OpenCourseWare project. Most of them are really fantastic, and the site is worth browsing through. Of particular interest to me is the series of lectures for a course devoted to Douglas Hofstadter’s Gödel, Escher, Bach. Which, if you haven’t read, you should; these lectures might help you along if you’ve found it a bit difficult.

Incidentally, the course is taught by an undergrad math major! The guy’s teaching style is a little rough, but he’s actually laudably competent.

books, computer science, language, math, science, video, web | No Comments »

Wolfram Alpha’s Launching Tonight

May 15th, 2009

Wolfram Alpha

At 8 PM Eastern time, Wolfram Alpha is going live. If you haven’t yet seen the screencast, you should, because it looks terrific. I doubt it will be more than a few weeks until Google comes up with an equally incredible product, but still, pretty neat.

See above for a totally authentic screenshot of the new software. IT KNOWS EVERYTHING

computer science, language, math, science, video | No Comments »