<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Harry Schwartz Eats the World &#187; math</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/category/math/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world</link>
	<description>Figuratively.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:17:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Numbers Are New</title>
		<link>http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/numbers-are-new</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/numbers-are-new#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 01:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[math]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/?p=1406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#8217;ve probably heard of bands of people in Australia or Amazonia whose concept of number is limited to, &#8220;1, 2, 3, 4, many.&#8221;  Here&#8217;s a really good article describing that phenomenon in a lot more detail.
One especially interesting result was the notion that people intuitively distribute numbers on a logarithmic scale rather than a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve probably heard of bands of people in Australia or Amazonia whose concept of number is limited to, &#8220;1, 2, 3, 4, many.&#8221;  Here&#8217;s a really <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2010/mar/31/alex-bellos-numberland">good article</a> describing that phenomenon in a lot more detail.</p>
<p>One especially interesting result was the notion that people intuitively distribute numbers on a logarithmic scale rather than a linear one.  As it turns out, children do this, too.</p>
<blockquote><p>
It is Pica&#8217;s belief that understanding quantities in terms of estimating ratios is a universal human intuition, due to the fact that ratios are much more important for survival in the wild. Historically, faced with a group of adversaries, we needed to know instantly whether there were more of them than us. When we saw two trees, we needed to know instantly which had more fruit hanging from it. In neither case was it necessary to enumerate every enemy or every fruit individually. The crucial thing was to be able to make quick estimates of the relevant amounts and compare them; in other words to make approximations and judge their ratios.
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/numbers-are-new/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Universal Laws</title>
		<link>http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/universal-laws</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/universal-laws#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 14:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[actual food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[math]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/?p=1395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/waitress.png"><img src="http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/waitress-small.png" alt="Man, this happens to me *every time*" title="Man, this happens to me *every time*" width="700" height="352" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1397" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/universal-laws/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On Finishing Books</title>
		<link>http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/on-finishing-books</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/on-finishing-books#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 05:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infographic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[math]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/?p=1370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I just finished W.G. Sebald&#8217;s Austerlitz, which all things considered is a pretty good book, despite my occasional furious claims to the contrary.1 I started it sometime around October, read most of it, and then put it aside.  I just finished the last hundred-odd pages a few minutes ago.  This seems to be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/reading-graph.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1371" title="reading-graph" src="http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/reading-graph.png" alt="reading-graph" width="432" height="409" /></a></p>
<p>I just finished W.G. Sebald&#8217;s <em>Austerlitz</em>, which all things considered is a pretty good book, despite my occasional furious claims to the contrary.<sup>1</sup> I started it sometime around October, read most of it, and then put it aside.  I just finished the last hundred-odd pages a few minutes ago.  This seems to be a pattern &#8212; I start a book really enthusiastically, then get a little bored or distracted and put it down for awhile.  Eventually I get so tired of seeing it sitting in my queue, shamefully reminding me of my miniscule attention span, that I just plant myself down on the couch and force myself to finish it.  The satisfaction of finishing the book outweighs the grueling completion process.</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t usually the case, of course.  Only for certain books.  I&#8217;m pretty sure I&#8217;d hate reading if this was the normal situation.</p>
<p>Note that the concept of book-graphing has been <a href="http://intensionalmeaning.blogspot.com/2007/12/harry-and-julia-explain-world.html">explored before</a>, which reminds me: I want the book equivalent of a pedometer, so I can settle this graph thing once and for all.  Then I want to correlate information about the structure, genre and subject matter of the book with the pace at which I read it.</p>
<p>If I worked at Amazon, I would be spying on customers&#8217; Kindle usage and mining that data so hard.</p>
<p><sup>1</sup> No chapters?  <em>Really?</em> Why would you do that, Sebald?  <em>I demand discrete chunks.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/on-finishing-books/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Logicomix</title>
		<link>http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/logicomix</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/logicomix#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 16:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[art+design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[math]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old dead white guys]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/?p=1366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I&#8217;m pretty sure that if you like this blog you&#8217;d like a graphic novel biography of Bertrand Russell, which is exactly what Logicomix is.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/logicomix.jpg"><img src="http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/logicomix.jpg" alt="logicomix" title="logicomix" width="540" height="548" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1367" /></a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure that if you like this blog you&#8217;d like a graphic novel biography of Bertrand Russell, which is exactly what <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Logicomix-Search-Truth-Apostolos-Doxiadis/dp/1596914521/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&#038;s=books&#038;qid=1268585126&#038;sr=8-1">Logicomix</a> is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/logicomix/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Math Ruins Everything</title>
		<link>http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/math-ruins-everything</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/math-ruins-everything#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[math]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/?p=1355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Julia just sent me one of Paul Krugman&#8217;s analyses of the causes of the financial meltdown: How Did Economists Get It So Wrong?
The whole article&#8217;s good, but I especially love this point:

&#8230; economists, as a group, mistook beauty, clad in impressive-looking mathematics, for truth&#8230; the central cause of the profession’s failure was the desire for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julia just sent me one of Paul Krugman&#8217;s analyses of the causes of the financial meltdown: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/06/magazine/06Economic-t.html?_r=4">How Did Economists Get It So Wrong?</a></p>
<p>The whole article&#8217;s good, but I especially love this point:</p>
<blockquote><p>
&#8230; economists, as a group, mistook beauty, clad in impressive-looking mathematics, for truth&#8230; the central cause of the profession’s failure was the desire for an all-encompassing, intellectually elegant approach that also gave economists a chance to show off their mathematical prowess.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Pointedly ignoring the differences between a beautifully abstract model and the messy underlying reality that it (supposedly) represents?  Well I&#8217;ve <em>certainly</em> never been guilty of <em>that</em> particular intellectual sin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/math-ruins-everything/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Budget Proposal 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/budget-proposal-2011</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/budget-proposal-2011#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[art+design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infographic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[math]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/?p=1260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The New York Times has a lovely interactive infographic detailing the proposed 2011 budget.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/2011-Budget.png"><img src="http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/2011-Budget-300x173.png" alt="2011 Budget" title="2011 Budget" width="300" height="173" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-1261" /></a></p>
<p>The New York Times has a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/02/01/us/budget.html">lovely interactive infographic</a> detailing the proposed 2011 budget.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/budget-proposal-2011/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nomograms</title>
		<link>http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/nomograms</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/nomograms#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 03:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[art+design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infographic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[math]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/?p=1140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Nomograms (or sometimes nomographs) are graphical single-purpose analog computing devices.  They range from the very simple &#8211; like the above BMI calculator &#8211; to the (often beautifully) complex.  Once upon a time they were commonly used for navigation, astronomy, surveying, and countless other things.  Now, what with cheap omnipresent digital computers, they&#8217;ve [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/bmi-nomogram.png"><img src="http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/bmi-nomogram-259x300.png" alt="bmi-nomogram" title="bmi-nomogram" width="259" height="300" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-1141" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nomogram">Nomograms</a> (or sometimes <em>nomographs</em>) are graphical single-purpose analog computing devices.  They range from the very simple &#8211; like the above BMI calculator &#8211; to the (often beautifully) <a href="http://myreckonings.com/wordpress/2009/04/18/magnetic-deviation-comprehension-compensation-and-computation-part-ii">complex</a>.  Once upon a time they were commonly used for navigation, astronomy, surveying, and countless other things.  Now, what with cheap omnipresent digital computers, they&#8217;ve fallen into disuse.</p>
<p>Like beautiful math?  Need a calendar for 2010?  Download a copy of Ron Doerfler&#8217;s <a href="http://myreckonings.com/wordpress/2009/12/31/a-2010-graphical-computing-calendar">Graphical Computing Calendar</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/nomograms/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Undirected Deliciousness</title>
		<link>http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/undirected-deliciousness</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/undirected-deliciousness#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 08:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[actual food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[math]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/?p=1121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Connected flavors taste good together.  Any additions?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Flavor-Graph.png" alt="Flavor Graph" title="Flavor Graph" width="584" height="713" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1122" /></p>
<p>Connected flavors taste good together.  Any additions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/undirected-deliciousness/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We Know You&#8217;re Out There, Spiderman</title>
		<link>http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/we-know-youre-out-there-spiderman</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/we-know-youre-out-there-spiderman#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[animals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cranks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[math]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/?p=877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Abstract
Using absolutely bulletproof science, we demonstrate that 35.3 spidermen are created annually and that hundreds live secretly among us.
Introduction
Prompted by arguments about the possibility of radioactive spidermen living among us, Mr. Harman and I decided to use science to determine how many spidermen (if any) exist on Earth.  It&#8217;s difficult to extrapolate from the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2 style="margin-bottom: 10px;">Abstract</h2>
<p>Using absolutely bulletproof science, we demonstrate that 35.3 spidermen are created annually and that hundreds live secretly among us.<br />
<h2 style="margin-bottom: 10px;">Introduction</h2>
<p>Prompted by arguments about the possibility of radioactive spidermen living among us, Mr. Harman and I decided to use science to determine how many spidermen (if any) exist on Earth.  It&#8217;s difficult to extrapolate from the single known instance of a spiderman (hereafter the <em>SKI</em>), but following the example of the Drake equation we&#8217;ve developed a predictive formula.  Behold the incontrovertible majesty of the <em>Harman-Schwartz equation:</em></p>
<p>Our equation states that:</p>
<h2 style="margin-bottom: 10px;"><em>N = P<sub>e</sub> &times; f<sub>s</sub> &times; f<sub>r</sub> &times; f<sub>l</sub> &times; f<sub>p</sub> &times; f<sub>g</sub></em></h2>
<p>where:</p>
<dt>N</dt>
<dd>is the number of radioactive spidermen created each year.</dd>
<dt>P<sub>e</sub></dt>
<dd>is the population of the Earth.</dd>
<dt>f<sub>s</sub></dt>
<dd>is the fraction of people who are bitten by a spider each year.</dd>
<dt>f<sub>r</sub></dt>
<dd>is the fraction of spider-bites perpetrated by irradiated spiders.</dd>
<dt>f<sub>l</sub></dt>
<dd>is the fraction of bitten people who survive.</dd>
<dt>f<sub>p</sub></dt>
<dd>is the fraction of bitten people who develop superpowers.</dd>
<dt>f<sub>g</sub></dt>
<dd>is the fraction of spidermen who choose to use their powers for good.</dd>
</dl>
<h2 style="margin: 10px 0;">Total Population</h2>
<p>Note that by using the above formula we&#8217;ve only calculated the number of spidermen being generated each year and not the total number of spiderman living on earth at any given time.  This can be calculated by the following equation:</p>
<h2 style="margin-bottom: 10px;"><em>N<sub>tot</sub> = N(&lt;A<sub>d</sub>&gt; &#8211; &lt;A<sub>c</sub>&gt;)</em></h2>
<p>where:</p>
<dl>
<dt>N<sub>tot</sub></dt>
<dd>is the total number of spidermen living on earth at any given time.</dd>
<dt>&lt;A<sub>d</sub>&gt;</dt>
<dd>is the expected age at which a spiderman dies.</dd>
<dt>&lt;A<sub>c</sub>&gt;</dt>
<dd>is the expected age at which a spiderman is created.</dd>
</dl>
<h2 style="margin: 10px 0;">Plugging in the Numbers</h2>
<dl style="margin-bottom: 10px;">
<dt>P<sub>e</sub></dt>
<dd>The population of the Earth is around 6.67 billion.</dd>
<dt>f<sub>s</sub></dt>
<dd>We estimate that about 1.66 &times; 10<sup>-3</sup>% of people are bitten by a spider each year.</dd>
<dt>f<sub>r</sub></dt>
<dd>Between Chernobyl, Hiroshima/Nagasaki, and assorted other tests and accidents, about 2.55% of the land area of the Earth has been irradiated to some degree.  We can use this as <em>f<sub>r</sub></em> if we assume an evenly distributed spider distribution.</dd>
<dt>f<sub>l</sub></dt>
<dd>The vast majority (about 99.9%) of people survive spider bites, but obviously irradiated spiders are more deadly.  Let&#8217;s set <em>f<sub>l</sub></em> to 50%.</dd>
<dt>f<sub>p</sub></dt>
<dd>Working off the SKI, we&#8217;d have to assume that this is 100%.  Let&#8217;s be conservative, though, and say only a tenth of people bitten by radioactive spiders develop superpowers.</dd>
<dt>f<sub>g</sub></dt>
<dd>We&#8217;re totally guessing here and saying that 25% of superpowered radioactive spidermen will dedicate their lives to doing good.</dd>
</dl>
<p>Plugging those figures into the equation, we estimate that on average, <strong>35.3 spidermen are created annually</strong>.</p>
<dl style="margin-bottom: 10px;">
<dt>&lt;A<sub>c</sub>&gt;</dt>
<dd>The median age in the world&#8217;s population is 27.5 years, which is what we&#8217;re using.</dd>
<dt>&lt;A<sub>d</sub>&gt;</dt>
<dd> This is a controversial term.  For the purposes of our study, we&#8217;ve made the simplifying assumption that spidermen have an average lifespan equal to the human average (73.1 years).  It could be argued for the that spidermen are especially prone to an early violent death, but following the example of the SKI we argue that the rates of violent death and cloning are approximately equal, thereby sidestepping the whole issue.</dd>
</dl>
<p>By plugging these numbers into our final equation, we find that at any given time on Earth, on average there are <strong>1,609 radioactive spidermen living secretly among us.</strong> &#9744;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/we-know-youre-out-there-spiderman/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quines</title>
		<link>http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/quines</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/quines#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[computer science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[math]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old dead white guys]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/?p=202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Named after the American philosopher and logician W.V.O. Quine, a quine is a program whose only output is its own code.  Here&#8217;s a neat example in Lisp/Scheme, taken from the wikipedia article:((lambda (x) (list x (list 'quote x)))'(lambda (x) (list x (list 'quote x))))
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Named after the American philosopher and logician W.V.O. Quine, a <span style="font-style: italic;">quine</span> is a program whose only output is its own code.  Here&#8217;s a neat example in Lisp/Scheme, taken from the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quine_%28computing%29">wikipedia</a> article:<br /><code><br />((lambda (x) (list x (list 'quote x)))<br />'(lambda (x) (list x (list 'quote x))))<br /></code></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/quines/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
