<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Impossible Proof</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/an-impossible-proof/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/an-impossible-proof</link>
	<description>Figuratively.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 17:59:49 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt Busche</title>
		<link>http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/an-impossible-proof/comment-page-1#comment-9494</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Busche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 05:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogonauts.com/eats-the-world/?p=149#comment-9494</guid>
		<description>Well, it&#039;s been a long time since I&#039;ve done geometry.  It is claimed that right triangles ARM and and BQM are congruent because they have a side that&#039;s the same length; but for two right triangles to be congruent I think you need two sides to have the same length, OR you need one side and an angle to be the same (in addition to the obvious right angles).

Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it&#8217;s been a long time since I&#8217;ve done geometry.  It is claimed that right triangles ARM and and BQM are congruent because they have a side that&#8217;s the same length; but for two right triangles to be congruent I think you need two sides to have the same length, OR you need one side and an angle to be the same (in addition to the obvious right angles).</p>
<p>Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

